<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Hollywood Geek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thehollywoodgeek.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thehollywoodgeek.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts and Dreams on Technology and Entertainment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:37:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MLB.TV review by Roberto Montesinos</title>
		<link>http://thehollywoodgeek.com/2010/06/28/mlb-tv%c2%a0review/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roberto Montesinos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehollywoodgeek.com/?p=261#comment-47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How would this ad-free model work for residual payments to actors, writers and directors that you do the wink-wink to Hulu? This residual model was at the forefront of a recent strike by writers and the issue was kicked down the road for further study. Negotiations are coming up in the next year or so - what has been learned thus far to offset another potential labor action?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would this ad-free model work for residual payments to actors, writers and directors that you do the wink-wink to Hulu? This residual model was at the forefront of a recent strike by writers and the issue was kicked down the road for further study. Negotiations are coming up in the next year or so &#8211; what has been learned thus far to offset another potential labor action?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MLB.TV review by jay robertson</title>
		<link>http://thehollywoodgeek.com/2010/06/28/mlb-tv%c2%a0review/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jay robertson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehollywoodgeek.com/?p=261#comment-46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d beg to differ; while MLB.TV holds promise, it still has some serious glitches.  I was a subscriber for the last two months of the 2009 season; I had so many problems with MLB not recognizing my location when using my laptop, I dropped the service.  I would try to log on while on the road, only to get the warning that I was in a blackout area, and could not watch my chosen game. ( I wasn&#039;t - a ten minute call to MLB customer service would solve the problem, but that was the ONLY solution - it got very tiresome to be forced to call every time I wanted to watch a game while away from home.)

This year, I tried again - it is so promising that I gave it another shot.  It works fine over a fast cable connection, both on my computer and my PS3.  But while slick, the PS3 doesn&#039;t give you access to all of the features that are available on the computer, including the 4 way split screen that Premium offers.  Which is counterintuitive - I can watch 4 games on my computer, but not on my 55&quot; plasma and PS3?

I could live with that, but what is worse are server issues - when MLB.TV experiences a heavier load than expected, the HD quality drops off rather quickly; and you know, I could even live with that, but sometimes the feed will lockup for an entire inning, and when it comes back, your team can easily be ahead or behind by a couple of runs.  I tried to watch an archived game last weekend, and discovered a new glitch - every 5-10 minutes (sometimes less) the game would go back to the beginning of the game.  I use the &quot;Jump to Inning&quot; feature, and then ff to where I was, but the game would skip back to the beginning.  Behaving much like an overused dvd rented from your local low budget rental store.

It was at that point I discovered that MLB.TV&#039;s customer service had dropped in quality along with its feed.  I&#039;m no longer a subscriber.  Maybe I&#039;ll try again next year.

Good luck to everyone else - its pretty good when its working (as long as you realize you can NEVER watch your local team, even if they&#039;re playing on the road.  Nor can you watch a nationally televised game, even if your local Fox station is NOT broadcasting that game.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d beg to differ; while MLB.TV holds promise, it still has some serious glitches.  I was a subscriber for the last two months of the 2009 season; I had so many problems with MLB not recognizing my location when using my laptop, I dropped the service.  I would try to log on while on the road, only to get the warning that I was in a blackout area, and could not watch my chosen game. ( I wasn&#8217;t &#8211; a ten minute call to MLB customer service would solve the problem, but that was the ONLY solution &#8211; it got very tiresome to be forced to call every time I wanted to watch a game while away from home.)</p>
<p>This year, I tried again &#8211; it is so promising that I gave it another shot.  It works fine over a fast cable connection, both on my computer and my PS3.  But while slick, the PS3 doesn&#8217;t give you access to all of the features that are available on the computer, including the 4 way split screen that Premium offers.  Which is counterintuitive &#8211; I can watch 4 games on my computer, but not on my 55&#8243; plasma and PS3?</p>
<p>I could live with that, but what is worse are server issues &#8211; when MLB.TV experiences a heavier load than expected, the HD quality drops off rather quickly; and you know, I could even live with that, but sometimes the feed will lockup for an entire inning, and when it comes back, your team can easily be ahead or behind by a couple of runs.  I tried to watch an archived game last weekend, and discovered a new glitch &#8211; every 5-10 minutes (sometimes less) the game would go back to the beginning of the game.  I use the &#8220;Jump to Inning&#8221; feature, and then ff to where I was, but the game would skip back to the beginning.  Behaving much like an overused dvd rented from your local low budget rental store.</p>
<p>It was at that point I discovered that MLB.TV&#8217;s customer service had dropped in quality along with its feed.  I&#8217;m no longer a subscriber.  Maybe I&#8217;ll try again next year.</p>
<p>Good luck to everyone else &#8211; its pretty good when its working (as long as you realize you can NEVER watch your local team, even if they&#8217;re playing on the road.  Nor can you watch a nationally televised game, even if your local Fox station is NOT broadcasting that game.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How many times can I pay Major League Baseball? by Roberto Montesinos</title>
		<link>http://thehollywoodgeek.com/2010/06/10/how-many-times-can-i-pay-major%c2%a0league%c2%a0baseball/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roberto Montesinos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 01:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehollywoodgeek.com/?p=250#comment-42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find this article hard to believe, yet I believe you. My disbelief comes in that this has the potential for customers, life-long fans like you, becoming infuriated with the content. I believe that all the charges come from the various content-providers and the lack of a coordinated way of servicing the customers as opposed to servicing the content providers. Maybe a similar campaign to what got Betty White the Saturday Night Live hosting gig (which she rocked) is in order because you didn&#039;t even mention DirectTV. Interesting times Mr. Halleen. Thanks for pointing this out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this article hard to believe, yet I believe you. My disbelief comes in that this has the potential for customers, life-long fans like you, becoming infuriated with the content. I believe that all the charges come from the various content-providers and the lack of a coordinated way of servicing the customers as opposed to servicing the content providers. Maybe a similar campaign to what got Betty White the Saturday Night Live hosting gig (which she rocked) is in order because you didn&#8217;t even mention DirectTV. Interesting times Mr. Halleen. Thanks for pointing this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will Google TV Destroy TV? by nvenkatraman</title>
		<link>http://thehollywoodgeek.com/2010/05/28/will-google-tv-destroy-tv/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nvenkatraman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehollywoodgeek.com/?p=206#comment-39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Google TV will redefine (not destroy) TV.  We have come a long way from three network television companies but the monetization logic has not evolved significantly. While we have changed how we watch television, the broader system of how we &quot;search--&gt;access--&gt;consume--&gt;  connect--&gt;share--&gt;store&quot; media has not kept pace.  I see Google TV and follow-on announcements from Apple, Hulu, Netscape and others to be part of the broader redefinition of TV rather than destruction of TV. The destruction may be to traditional ways of monetizing it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Google TV will redefine (not destroy) TV.  We have come a long way from three network television companies but the monetization logic has not evolved significantly. While we have changed how we watch television, the broader system of how we &#8220;search&#8211;&gt;access&#8211;&gt;consume&#8211;&gt;  connect&#8211;&gt;share&#8211;&gt;store&#8221; media has not kept pace.  I see Google TV and follow-on announcements from Apple, Hulu, Netscape and others to be part of the broader redefinition of TV rather than destruction of TV. The destruction may be to traditional ways of monetizing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of All Media was written in 1993. Kinda. by N. Venkatraman</title>
		<link>http://thehollywoodgeek.com/2010/05/22/future-of-all-media/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[N. Venkatraman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 14:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehollywoodgeek.com/?p=171#comment-38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent recap of the story from 1993 with 20/20 hindsight.  This is a good lesson for many who still grapple with the issue of precisely predicting the future--especially when it involves not only convergence in technologies but also overlapping business practices and changing behavior of consumers.  The info-highway of 1990s was largely based on text (and images) accessed through desktop and luggable laptops; in the 2000, the highway was about communication (Email and IM) through different devices--still dominated by PCs (and mobile phones). This decade is about multi-media, two-way, read-write web, create-consume web, etc.  Now, the information highway is challenged not technologically but in terms of business models (how to go away from the expectation that information is free to entertainment is premium) and competition across different segments of the information highway.  I expect this decade to be radically different--but do I dare predict who will be the winner in 2020? Perhaps Not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent recap of the story from 1993 with 20/20 hindsight.  This is a good lesson for many who still grapple with the issue of precisely predicting the future&#8211;especially when it involves not only convergence in technologies but also overlapping business practices and changing behavior of consumers.  The info-highway of 1990s was largely based on text (and images) accessed through desktop and luggable laptops; in the 2000, the highway was about communication (Email and IM) through different devices&#8211;still dominated by PCs (and mobile phones). This decade is about multi-media, two-way, read-write web, create-consume web, etc.  Now, the information highway is challenged not technologically but in terms of business models (how to go away from the expectation that information is free to entertainment is premium) and competition across different segments of the information highway.  I expect this decade to be radically different&#8211;but do I dare predict who will be the winner in 2020? Perhaps Not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will Google TV Destroy TV? by Mike Halleen</title>
		<link>http://thehollywoodgeek.com/2010/05/28/will-google-tv-destroy-tv/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Halleen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 19:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehollywoodgeek.com/?p=206#comment-36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest example... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ql-N3F1FhW4

3M+ views for a 2.5 minute commercial.  Not even part of a show, just making its way around the world because it&#039;s entertaining.  

30 seconds is no longer the limit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Latest example&#8230; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ql-N3F1FhW4" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ql-N3F1FhW4</a></p>
<p>3M+ views for a 2.5 minute commercial.  Not even part of a show, just making its way around the world because it&#8217;s entertaining.  </p>
<p>30 seconds is no longer the limit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DVRs still suck by Mike Halleen</title>
		<link>http://thehollywoodgeek.com/2010/05/05/dvrs-still-suck/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Halleen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 19:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehollywoodgeek.com/?p=104#comment-35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Demodave. Sorry to hear of your troubles. Just to clarify, I&#039;m not taking a swipe at any one company&#039;s implementation of a DVR, but at the basic underlying concept they all share.   Your future on demand systems will have glitches too. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Demodave. Sorry to hear of your troubles. Just to clarify, I&#8217;m not taking a swipe at any one company&#8217;s implementation of a DVR, but at the basic underlying concept they all share.   Your future on demand systems will have glitches too. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DVRs still suck by demodave</title>
		<link>http://thehollywoodgeek.com/2010/05/05/dvrs-still-suck/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[demodave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 19:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehollywoodgeek.com/?p=104#comment-34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave and Mike,

Generally, I think it&#039;s all good and brilliant.  Really enjoyed the read.

I look forward to truly &quot;on-demand&quot; content.  My own HGTV &quot;Real Estate Interventions&quot; or &quot;My Big Fat Renovation Nightmare&quot; schedule to match my needs.

I can totally relate, though, to the issue of missing half of &quot;The Amazing Race&quot; because golf went long.  Or because there was snow on my dish.  And I don&#039;t even dislike golf (or snow, for that matter)!

I have, however, been, in my personal experience, totally disappointed by the Dish end of the AT&amp;T-Dish relationship.  I have been so bitterly disappointed that I am willing to post this disparaging commentary on Dish.  I will send them their damn DVR back only to avoid paying for it.  Otherwise, I&#039;d stomp on it and sends its broken sorry ass back to them on their very own postage-paid nickel.  F* &#039;em.

demo]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave and Mike,</p>
<p>Generally, I think it&#8217;s all good and brilliant.  Really enjoyed the read.</p>
<p>I look forward to truly &#8220;on-demand&#8221; content.  My own HGTV &#8220;Real Estate Interventions&#8221; or &#8220;My Big Fat Renovation Nightmare&#8221; schedule to match my needs.</p>
<p>I can totally relate, though, to the issue of missing half of &#8220;The Amazing Race&#8221; because golf went long.  Or because there was snow on my dish.  And I don&#8217;t even dislike golf (or snow, for that matter)!</p>
<p>I have, however, been, in my personal experience, totally disappointed by the Dish end of the AT&amp;T-Dish relationship.  I have been so bitterly disappointed that I am willing to post this disparaging commentary on Dish.  I will send them their damn DVR back only to avoid paying for it.  Otherwise, I&#8217;d stomp on it and sends its broken sorry ass back to them on their very own postage-paid nickel.  F* &#8216;em.</p>
<p>demo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of All Media was written in 1993. Kinda. by Tweets that mention The Future of All Media was written in 1993. Kinda. « The Hollywood Geek -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://thehollywoodgeek.com/2010/05/22/future-of-all-media/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tweets that mention The Future of All Media was written in 1993. Kinda. « The Hollywood Geek -- Topsy.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 18:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehollywoodgeek.com/?p=171#comment-33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Stephan Shakespeare, doug rivers. doug rivers said: &quot;Info Highway&quot; predictions 17 years later: pretty good on the concepts, but so off-target. http://bit.ly/diRAua [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Stephan Shakespeare, doug rivers. doug rivers said: &quot;Info Highway&quot; predictions 17 years later: pretty good on the concepts, but so off-target. <a href="http://bit.ly/diRAua" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/diRAua</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of All Media was written in 1993. Kinda. by The Info Highway &#8211; 17 years later &#124; Mobile Press</title>
		<link>http://thehollywoodgeek.com/2010/05/22/future-of-all-media/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Info Highway &#8211; 17 years later &#124; Mobile Press]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 17:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehollywoodgeek.com/?p=171#comment-32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The story is still available in Time&#8217;s archives here. But it&#8217;s more fun to read the Producers Guild version, which has been annotated with the benefit of hindsight by Mike Halleen, a product manager at the Disney (DIS) Interactive Media Group who writes a blog called The Hollywood Geek. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The story is still available in Time&#8217;s archives here. But it&#8217;s more fun to read the Producers Guild version, which has been annotated with the benefit of hindsight by Mike Halleen, a product manager at the Disney (DIS) Interactive Media Group who writes a blog called The Hollywood Geek. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

